As trite as it is, the phrase "garbage in, garbage out"
is still applicable to the hardware and raw materials used in
the production of a package. "Pressmanship" cannot make up for
all of the potential failures and/or possible complications that
can arise during the conversion, print storage, filling, filled
package storage, shipping, final use, and disposal of that
package. It therefore becomes crucial for the package developer
and converter to anticipate every aspect of these seven phases
in the life of a package.
Ink used for printing is a major player in the packaging
production process. Unfortunately, many converter orders sound
just like this: "I need 100 pounds of each process color, plus
Pantone®* XYZ for a job that's going on press
tomorrow." That's it! The ink maker is then expected to
immediately predict a complete set of requirements for these
inks.
Other than going by established color standards, and being
familiar with the particular press conditions, there is no way
for an ink supplier to completely forecast all of the ink
properties required for the seven stages of package life.
Fortunately, in a majority of cases, just by knowing the end use
of a package, ink makers can provide inks that will meet the
needs. But overlooking just a single need can cause failure.
Years ago, I was visiting a package designer who proudly showed
me a beautiful package he had recently designed for this year's
"line." The primary color was a clean bright magenta that only a
rhodamine-based pigment could match. Had I not questioned the
need for fade resistance, our formulator would have matched the
color, only to have the package fail out in the field. Without
the proper information, formulating an ink is a disaster waiting
to happen.
How, then, can we avoid this problem?
In order to formulate an ink or coating for packaging use, the
ink maker must team with the converter, and often the package
buyer, to get the full range of requirements. If the converter
and package buyer are well schooled in the prerequisites for the
package prior to placing the ink order, a great deal of time can
be saved, and there will be significantly less chance for a
failure out in the field. The question is, how can this be done?
It's not really difficult if one just takes each of the seven
phases in the life of the package and thinks about what the
package will or could be subjected to during each phase. This
will lead to the properties required for the ink and/or the
package. From this, the team can establish test methods. These
can be procedures developed for just that one package, or, more
likely, already established standard test methods found either
in the ASTM book of standards or in a printing ink manual. Once
test methods have been agreed upon, the specifications must be
set. These must be well thought out, must take into account the
worst possible scenario, yet must still be reasonable enough to
be met in a production situation.
7-Phase Checklist
I have found it helpful to think out each phase in order to
assure that nothing is overlooked. Each phase can then be
further divided to assure that no need, no matter how
insignificant it might seem, is overlooked. Completing the
following checklist provides a good base of information for an
ink formulator, and will help insure that the ink maker takes all
requirements into consideration.
PHASE I: CONVERSION
This information will help the ink formulator determine
the proper formulation for adhesion and printability on that
specific substrate.
This will allow the ink maker to deliver an ink with the
required color strength and general press runnability.
Because these properties are generally fashioned to
attract the consumer, they are extremely critical and must meet
the specifications of the package buyer.
Care must be taken to assure that current regulations are
completely met.
This information will determine which properties, such as
heat resistance, wax bleed, score pick resistance, bond
strength, etc., are required for the dry ink film on the
substrate or in the laminate.
PHASE 2: PRINT STORAGE
This information is necessary in order to formulate block
and offsetting resistance into the ink.
PHASE 3: FILLING OPERATION
This information is very critical to determine if a
minimum or maximum coefficient of friction (COF) or slide angle
is required. Also, it will indicate the need for chemical,
product, (i.e., soap, grease, alcohol, etc.), temperature,
moisture vapor transmission, water, steam and rub/abrasion
resistance.
PHASE 4: SHIPPING
Formulators may have to build in temperature, moisture,
moisture vapor, water, and rub-abrasion resistance for extreme
shipping conditions.
PHASE 5: FILLED PACKAGE STORAGE
Light, weather, temperature, moisture vapor transmission
and block resistance, as well as COF can be formulated into inks
or coatings to meet these conditions. If refrigeration is
involved, ammonia resistance is usually a requirement for the
inks and/or coatings.
PHASE 6: END USE
These conditions might require that product, chemical,
solvent, grease, alkali, light, weather, water, moisture vapor
or temperature resistance be formulated into the ink.
PHASE 7: PACKAGE DISPOSAL
All of the environmental regulations must be known in
order to assure compliance for the proper disposal of a printed
package.
Potentially Serious Consequences
During my 36 years in the ink business, I have seen a wide
variety of ink-related failures in the production and life of a
package. Several years ago when wax-coated drinking cups were
very common, I received a call from a converter complaining that
their wax bath was turning yellow during the waxing operation.
In this specific case the cup was printed with red and brown
inks, thoroughly dried, and subsequently passed through a trough
of molten wax. The wax in the trough had turned yellow,
producing a yellow cast on the non-image areas of the white cup.
The first action taken was to examine the ink formulas. The
brown ink called for an AAOT diarylide yellow (which is
wax-bleed resistant), a wax-bleed resistant red pigment, and a
carbon black. The red ink was mono-pigmented, and formulated
with a wax-bleed resistant red pigment. On reviewing the actual
batch tickets for each ink, however, I discovered that an AAA
diarylide yellow had been substituted in the brown, because the
plant had no AAOT yellow in stock. Unfortunately, the lab
technician who approved the substitution was not aware that this
ink was for wax cups. Had he been informed, there would have
been no approval for substitution because AAA diarylide yellows
are notorious for bleeding in wax.
Another incident typifying the need for complete, and not
partial, information occurred when the R&D lab of an ink company
was required to develop a very high gloss water flexo ink system
for a beverage bottle label. No indication was given that the
beverage was to be an alcoholic drink. A fine set of highly
water resistant inks was developed, and proofs were submitted to
the printer. The ink company looked very foolish when the inks
were rejected for not having alcohol resistance. The salesperson
just didn't ask the right questions, and brought incomplete
information back to the lab.
In this latter example the salesperson felt it would be too
"pushy" to ask numerous questions. It is difficult to believe
that any converter would think that of a salesperson if the
reasons for the questions were understood.
While all of this may seem very elaborate and involve a great
deal of detail, it is a necessity if problems are to be avoided.
Only after all of the phases in the life cycle of a package have
been considered, and assurance of testing or analytical
certification has occurred, can one feel secure that there will
be no failure in the package in the field.
*Pantone Inc.'s check-standard trademark for color reproduction
and color reproduction materials.